logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.12.24 2019구합72077
건축신고반려처분취소 청구의 소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 29, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an application (new construction) with the Defendant for a construction report (hereinafter “instant application”) with the content that the Plaintiff newly constructs three-class neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “instant building”) with a building area of 592.2 square meters in total and a total floor area of 592.2 square meters on the ground of 4,631 square meters (hereinafter “the instant forest”).

Supplementary Matters

(a) Submission of a detailed operational plan in connection with the use of the submitted building and the purpose of the building presented by the project owner at the time of presentation for residents;

(b) Submitting structural calculations of retaining walls, taking into account the height and amnesty of retaining walls of two and three sides (including preparation of technicians related to civil engineering and preparation of qualification verification documents);

(c) Submission of a construction plan to minimize damage to forests and the surrounding environment;

(d)to submit a detailed cross-section of the retaining wall and the site of the application, including the DNA existing retaining wall;

D Submission of Development Plans

(f) Submission of a sloping map containing a retaining wall, a private surface, or an application area on the south side;

(g) Submission of a certificate of permission for development activities of sections laid underground for the final discharge outlet related thereto;

(h) Written consent to land use and re-submission of a certificate of the seal impression of land owners (Submission of latest date documents);

(i) Submission of detailed plans related to the entry into and exit from construction vehicles - submission of such plans by clearly stating the passage of construction vehicles - Formulation of safety management measures following the passage of construction vehicles (by no later than one adjacent to traffic routes) - Submission of a plan to take measures when road traffic is damaged;

(j) Submission of a scheme to the residents’ opinions submitted at the time of resident presentation; and

On August 23, 2019, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the following supplementary documents (hereinafter “instant supplementary documents”) by August 30, 2019 (hereinafter “the first demand for supplementary documents”).

A. Before 200:

C. The Defendant, on September 3, 2019, failed to submit the supplementary documents to the Plaintiff within the time limit set for the first demand for supplementation, and thus, re-entered until September 11, 2019.

arrow