logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.12 2015가단167137
위자료
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 24, 2013, the Plaintiff was detained as a crime of fraud, and was admitted to Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) on February 27, 2014, and the sentence became final and conclusive upon being sentenced to imprisonment of two years and six months at the Seoul Southern District Court.

B. On May 19, 2014, the Plaintiff was transferred to a D prison. On the same day, around 13:30 on the same day, the Plaintiff requested the prison officer in charge to be able to solitary confinement as Seoul Southern Detention House, but rejected the entry room.

The plaintiff refused to enter the room at around 14:10 on the same day during the 11thn and 11thn of the confinement, and refused to immediately sit the correctional officer's instructions, and took a bath, and was investigated as a obstruction of performance of his/her duties by committing a disturbance, such as speaking the prison officer as being genuine to his/her human rights.

C. On May 28, 2014, the D Correctional Institution Disciplinary Committee imposed a punitive measure of 20 days imposed upon the Plaintiff on the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff was confined from the disciplinary Dong until June 7, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] 1-3, Eul 2-5, Eul 1-1-2, Eul 2-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that Defendant B, in the disciplinary action Dong, she immediately saw the Plaintiff, who is extending into a bridge, as a part of the Plaintiff’s argument, as a half-yearly.

Upon raising an objection, Defendant B made another correctional officer to bring the Plaintiff into the disciplinary action zone.

Defendant B committed several assaults against the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff, who was led to 34 official rooms.

피고 B은 34관구실내 감시카메라가 설치되지 않은 상담실에서도 원고의 손목과 팔 부분을 수갑과 포승줄로 꽉 묶게 한 후 원고의 머리에 헬멧을 씌웠다.

For more than 30 minutes, the Defendants expressed the Plaintiff’s bath, and assaulted the Plaintiff as his hand and her son.

At the time, the plaintiff was a hole in the body of the plaintiff, and the side of the plaintiff was an excessive passenger line use, which led to a wife for not less than 10 months.

Therefore, the Defendants are against the Plaintiff’s tort.

arrow