The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In the judgment of the court, all of the crimes are recognized, and the fact that the defendant did not obtain direct benefits from the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant.

However, the Defendant attempted to conceal the crime by sending cell phone text messages to the purport that the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he committed the instant crime even during the period of repeated crime, and that C and D, an accomplice, knew that they attempted to escape immediately to the police, and that they did not make a confession to commit fraud, and that they did not agree with the victims, etc. are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

In full view of these circumstances, Defendant’s character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments and records, it is difficult to view that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable and unreasonable. Thus, Defendant’s assertion

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.