The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant in the instant charges is a person engaged in driving of B-si.

On November 30, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car volume on the 22:47th day of November, 2013, which led to the second apartment 201 front of the second apartment 201, which is the Blue-si movable property at the seat of the Office of Education.

At the time, it is night, and there is a two-lane straight line, so a person engaged in driving duties of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the steering system and the brake system by accurately operating it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim C(35 years of age) who was crossing the road at the front direction of the defendant's running, and did not look into the victim C(35 years of age) and was shocked by the front direction of the defendant's taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer serious injury due to the above occupational negligence by causing the victim to suffer less than 12 weeks of serious injury, such as sexual cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral tys without any open room.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be punished against the victim’s express intent under Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. The victim may recognize the fact that he/she expressed his/her intent not to punish the defendant on June 24, 2014, after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag.