logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.06.20 2018고단366
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while having returned to a house to resolve sexual desire, had a mind to photograph women's physical form, etc. through the window of the floor.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Kameras and other crimes);

A. On April 27, 2017, at around 23:27, the Defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause a sense of sexual shame by photographing the victim’s body by photographing the victim’s name in a face where the victim was shower through the toilet windows of the above building No. 202, and photographing it on his cell phone for 13 minutes and causing a sense of sexual humiliation.

B. On July 18, 2017, around 01:19, the Defendant taken the body of the victim, who could cause a sense of sexual shame by photographing the victim’s D (n, 27 years of age) return to a white tyrts and panty panty shield, through the window of the above Dolle B02, at the Silung-si, at the time of Silung-si, and taken the victim’s cell phone for 1 minute 17 seconds, against his will.

2. Damage to property;

A. At around 03:00 on July 23, 2016, the Defendant discovered CCTV installed on the side window of the above E-Operational Building and thereby interfered with bringing the CCTV inside the b01st head, thereby impairing the utility of CCTV equivalent to KRW 300,000,000 in the market price of the victim F-owned by putting the above CCTV camera in hand to the bottom of the floor.

B. On July 29, 2016, at around 01:00, the Defendant discovered CCTV installed on the front door of the front door of 201 inside the said front door of the building following the building in operation, and thereby, caused interference to bring the inside of 201, the Defendant got a cover of the said CCTV with a vinyl in the vicinity, thereby impairing the effectiveness of the CCTV equivalent to KRW 300,000 at the market price owned by the victim F.

(c)

On April 20, 2017, at around 23:17, the Defendant discovered CCTV installed on the front door of the front door bank 201 in the following parts of the building in operation of the above E, and as a result, the Defendant interfered with bringing the CCTV into the front door 201, the Defendant owned the victim F, who opened the above CCTV in his hand and abandoned it on the nearby floor.

arrow