(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.09.13 2016고단86

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.09.13 2016고단86

사기

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 6, 201, the Defendant, at around 06:30, sent the same attitude that he would immediately pay repair expenses to the victims of the E industry operated by the victim D located in the following city: (a) in the light of the fact-finding process, the Defendant, who was aware of the victim D in the following city: (b) paid the repair expenses to the victims of the E industry operated by the victim D; and (c) requested F to color the door sales of the XG car.

However, even if the defendant entrusts the repair of the vehicle to the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the repair cost.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received the said car from the injured party for the amount equivalent to 7,50,000 won of the repair cost, and acquired the property benefits equivalent to the sum of 6,850,000 won in seven times from around that time to March 5, 2012, such as the statement in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

2. Regarding the repair cost indicated in No. 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 No. 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7, the summary of the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant introduced the victim to the owner of the pertinent vehicle, and there is no fact that the Defendant paid the repair cost of the pertinent vehicle to the victim.

Attached Form

In the case of repair costs set forth in No. 3 of the crime sight table No. 3, after completion of repair, the injured party paid repair costs in cash to the employees of the injured party, and even in the case of repair costs set forth in No. 5 of the crime sight table No. 5, the injured party received and was treated as being appropriated for KRW 700,000 between the injured party and the injured party received and paid the scrapping of the

3. Determination

A. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case relating to the repair cost stated in No. 1 of the List of Attached Crimes No. 1, i.e., the victim: (i) requested repair of the F-owned vehicle by the Defendant; and (ii) paid the repair cost at the time of requesting repair of the XG vehicle.

However, F is present in this court as a witness, and the defendant and himself are present in this court.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2018.04.13 2017노1390

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.12.15 2017고단103

-광주지방법원 2017.02.10 2016재고합39

-서울남부지방법원 2016.05.24 2016고단1383

-수원지방법원 2013.08.23 2013고정1960