The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (the sentence of imprisonment for four months, the suspended sentence of one year, and the order to attend a lecture for the treatment of sexual assault for forty hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant: (a) acknowledged the crime of this case as a primary offender, and agreed with the victim in the first instance; (b) the Defendant committed an indecent act against the female employees, who did not actively respond to the early life of the society that had not been employed for a long time; (c) committed an indecent act on the part of the victim alone by getting on and off the taxi; and (d) committed an indecent act on the part of the victim, even though the victim left the taxi in the damaged taxi, the Defendant continued to commit an indecent act on the part of the victim; and (c) the investigative agency denied all of the crimes of this case.

In addition, considering the defendant's age, sexual conduct, motive and means of the crime, results, circumstances after the crime, etc., all of the sentencing factors shown in the arguments in this case, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's improper argument in sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.