logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.12.18 2015나1073
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is that "B and the plaintiff, who is the lender, may terminate the loan for use at any time," "Function" which shall be reduced to 10th, " would require recommendation for personal hygiene" which shall be reduced to 10th, "if there is no assertion or proof," and the plaintiff can not terminate the contract unless he succeeds to the status of the contracting party with respect to the loan for use, unless there is any evidence that the plaintiff has succeeded to the status of the contracting party," and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for adding "the presumption that the above loan for use has been lawfully terminated" before "the plaintiff's assertion of the plaintiff is added to "the presumption that the above loan for use has been lawfully terminated."

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow