The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

With respect to the misunderstanding of facts or the misapprehension of legal principles, the court below found the Defendant guilty of this part of the charges by misapprehending the legal principles, even though the specifications of the transfer household of this case do not constitute official documents, such as without the function of proof.

The lower court’s imprisonment (four months of imprisonment) against the Defendant claiming unfair sentencing is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The following facts are acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below on the argument of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles: (a) the statement of the transfer household of this case prepared by the defendant at will is written in the same form as that of the actual transfer household perusal statement generally printed by the administrative agency concerned, but not D, the actual resident; (b) the statement of the transfer household of this case is written by the defendant as the moving household owner; and (c) the statement of the transfer household of this case is written by the first top, top, and top, the statement of the transfer household of this case is written by the "Seoul Metropolitan City: Sinsan City: Sinsan City", and the above administrative agency is written by the statement of the transfer household inspection statement in the second, and the last part of the last, the above administrative agency is in the form of informing the transfer household inspection details. It is more reliable that the above administrative agency's inspection statement of the transfer household of this case should be verified by its ability to prove it as a material document; and (d) it is important to prove the legal relation of this case.