The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (three years of suspended sentence for four months of imprisonment) is unreasonable because it is too unfasible.

2. Considering the fact that the defendant committed the instant non-licenseing act even if he/she had committed the same kind of offense, strict punishment corresponding thereto is required.

However, the defendant's mistake is divided, and the defendant does not again commit a non-licensed crime.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the pertinent unauthorized driving of this case did not cause a traffic accident; (b) the probation period ordered by the court below is relatively long-term; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and other various sentencing conditions specified in the present argument, such as the Defendant’s age, sex and environment; (d) the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below’

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.