A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 9, 2009, around December 9, 2009, the Defendant concluded that “Around December 9, 2009, the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million from the victim G,” and that “Around December 9, 2009, he/she would be paid a full amount of KRW 10 million to him/her.”

However, since the defendant was addicted to gambling at the time, and was not expected to receive any specific income from his idea of continuous gambling, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money rapidly even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The defendant was granted from the victim the amount of KRW 10 million on December 9, 2009 as the borrowed money.

2. On December 16, 2009, around December 16, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement that “Around December 16, 2009, the Defendant was the victim G at the G store of the Hyundai department store, one of whom is too likely to clock, and the card price would be paid for the face value of the face value.”

However, since the Defendant was addicted to gambling at the time and caused property to be stuffed, and there was no specific import in the idea of continuing gambling, there was no intention or ability to pay the price in time even if he purchased a clothing with a card in the name of the victim.

The Defendant was issued a letter of doubt equivalent to KRW 685,90,00 from the victim around December 16, 2009.

3. On February 5, 2010, around February 5, 2010, the fraud Defendant made a false statement to the victim at H Hospital located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that “The Defendant shall repay the Defendant’s debt to the victim, and that the Defendant shall repay the debt to the victim, if the Defendant is only two million won at that time.”

However, since the Defendant was addicted to gambling at the time, and was not expected to have any other income on the premise of continuing gambling, even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money rapidly.

The Defendant received KRW 1,950,000 from the victim as a loan, around February 5, 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim.