logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2014.10.23 2014고단174
상해등
Text

A fine of KRW 3,00,000 shall be imposed on the first offense of KRW 2,00,000 as to the Defendant’s decision, and a fine of KRW 3,00,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 13, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Intimidation) at the Cheongju District Court on September 13, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 13, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Cheongju Prison on June 20, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On November 7, 2011, the Defendant injured the victim at his house of the victim D (the age of 62) located in Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, on the ground that the victim was aware that the victim was drinking alcohol, and on the ground that the victim was her only drinking alcohol, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the mouths of internal walls, which require approximately four weeks of treatment.

2. On August 3, 2014, around 22:05, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes, by putting off the clothes left behind the said G on his hand and assaulting the Defendant’s body fights on the ground that G of the Rocheon Police Station, who was called out by the Defendant upon receiving a report that the Defendant was drunk, told the Defendant that he was drunk.

3. On August 3, 2014, at around 23:15, the Defendant damaged goods for public use: (a) at the Rocheon Police Station F box in the Yancheon-gun I, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, the Defendant was arrested and detained as a flagrant offender committing an obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) at the Gacheon-gun I, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant destroyed the glass equivalent to KRW 30,00 of the market value in the lawsuit on the ground that he did not cause water despite the shock; and (c) on the other hand, after the shock of the shock in the subsequent part, damaged goods used by public offices by shocking the bottom amount of KRW 33,00,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D and each testimony in G;

1. Each police officer's statement of H, D, J, and G;

1. Damage photographs by the F police box;

1. Written estimate;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records, copies of each written judgment and current status of confinement of individuals;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

arrow