1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from May 4, 2019 to February 6, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

1. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. On February 25, 2014, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant invested KRW 10 million in the Plaintiff’s office located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and invested KRW 10 million in order to perform construction works after receiving a contract for hotel interior and landscaping works from the Plaintiff to China’s Daesan.

6. On February 25, 2014, a letter of commitment was drawn up and issued to return KRW 100 million, and the Plaintiff wired to the Defendant a total of KRW 10 million on February 25, 2014 and KRW 10 million on February 27, 2014.

The plaintiff urged the defendant to pay the agreed amount after June 26, 2014, but has not been repaid so far. The defendant is obligated to pay the agreed amount of KRW 100 million and the delay damages to the plaintiff.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 7 through 9, the defendant prepared a letter of "each of the statements" (hereinafter "each of the following documents") on February 25, 2014 to the plaintiff on February 25, 2014, stating that "the defendant shall pay the plaintiff KRW 00,000 (including principal) as investment proceeds when receiving KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000 won.

However, it is a matter of fact-finding to determine what the parties indicated in relation to the declaration of intention and what is the purpose of the intention, and it is a legal meaning on the basis of recognized facts.