logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.07.26 2018고단640
교육환경보호에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Act on the Protection of Educational Environment and the Promotion of the Game Industry Act (the point of business without registration) shall provide Internet computer game facilities manufacturing industry and facilities in an educational environment protection zone in order to protect the health, sanitation, safety, learning, and educational environment of students, and any person who intends to operate an Internet computer game facilities business shall register with the competent Gu office;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without registering with the competent Gu office from March 16, 2018 to March 16:50, 2018, provided six computers from the “CPC room” operated by the Defendant on the Cheongju-si Office B and the first floor, which is an educational environment protection zone, and provided the Internet game facilities to many unspecified customers.

As a result, the defendant operated a business of providing unregistered Internet computer game facilities in educational environment protection zones.

2. A person who intends to produce or distribute a game product for the purpose of distributing a game product in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the classification of the rating and the point of providing a game product different from the classification of the rating) or for the purpose of providing such game product for use shall receive a rating from the Game Water Management Committee on the contents of the game product before producing or distributing the game product, and shall not provide such game product for the distribution or use, or display or store, for any purpose different from the contents of the rating.

Nevertheless, the Defendant provided a game product to many unspecified customers, such as the date and time, at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, and provided them with cash from customers different from the rating classification, and provided them with a game machine directly charged to a manager page and made them available by customers.

Accordingly, the defendant is different from the grade.

arrow