Text
1. The defendant shall pay 3,000,000 won to the plaintiff.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
3.Paragraph 1.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. Article 6(1) of the Housing Lease Protection Act provides that "If a lessee fails to notify the lessee of the refusal of the renewal, or to notify the lessee that the lessee would not renew the contract without any change in the terms and conditions, the lessee shall be deemed to have renewed the lease under the same conditions as the former one at the time the term expires, and if the lessee fails to notify by one month before the term of the lease expires, the same shall apply." Article 6-2(1) provides that "if the contract is renewed under Article 6(1), the lessee may notify at any time the lessor of the termination of the contract, notwithstanding Article 6(2) and Article 6-2(2) provides that "if the contract is renewed under Article 6(1), the termination under paragraph (1) becomes effective three months after the date the lessor is notified of the termination."
In addition, Article 3 (4) of the Housing Lease Protection Act provides that "the transferee of a leased house shall be deemed to succeed to the status of the lessor," and Article 12 of the Housing Lease Protection Act provides that "the provisions of this Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the lease contract
The term "" is defined as ".
B. In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff’s return to the instant case and the entire purport of the statements and arguments as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 3 are comprehensively taken into account: (a) as of December 16, 201, the Plaintiff’s return to the instant case; and (b) as of December 16, 201, the Plaintiff’s return to the Plaintiff and the entire purport of the arguments.
The term "the lease contract of this case" is "the lease contract of this case between 33 million won and 33 million won, and the lease contract of this case between January 30, 2012 and January 29, 2014.
B. Around January 30, 2014, the Plaintiff and C have entered into a pre-tax contract with the fixed date and entered into a pre-tax contract, and the Plaintiff and C have impliedly renewed the pre-tax contract of this case, and the Plaintiff entered into the pre-tax contract of this case with C on April 13, 2015.