The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the Defendant led to the confession of each of the facts charged in the instant case, and the Defendant’s mistake is divided, that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine, that the Victim F expressed his intent that the Defendant would not want the Defendant’s punishment, that the gains that the Defendant acquired through each of the instant crimes are small amounts of money, and that the Defendant’s health seems not good are favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the following facts are disadvantageous to the defendant.

Even though the defendant was guilty of criminal punishment for the same crime, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of it.

The crime of special intimidation and special intimidation in this case is a case of receiving property by threatening or threatening the victim F and H in knife, which is a dangerous object of the defendant, and is not very good in light of the method of the crime.

Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in a short period.

The defendant did not agree with the rest victims except the victim F, and did not receive a letter from them.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, relationship with victims, etc., the lower court's punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal for conclusion is without merit.