1. On May 2, 2016, the defendant trial office is delegated by the Cridge and is subject to disposition of dismissal from office against the plaintiff on May 2, 2016.

Basic Facts

The defendant, such as the status of the parties, is an organization that aims to protect and disseminate uniforms based on the gender and the F Constitution (hereinafter referred to as the "General Assembly Constitution"), as the highest church within the F religious order (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant religious order"), and carries out all projects incidental thereto, and therefore, has a jurisdiction over the trial (hereinafter referred to as the "general assembly trial division") to recommend teachers who violate the provisions delegated by the Assembly Constitution and the General Assembly Constitution, and to review and deal with the disciplinary action against them.

The parts related to this case among the defendant's general assembly constitution and the implementation rules of the general assembly constitution (hereinafter referred to as "implementation rules of this case") are as shown in the attached Form.

The Chago Association is a branch church belonging to the GEU of the defendant religious order.

(C) On November 19, 201, the Plaintiff, who belongs to the Defendant religious order, was delegated to the H pastor, who was the first founder, and was appointed as the second head of the C church, and was a member of the C church, who was appointed to the president.

Since around 2013, there is a dispute as to whether seven persons, such as I, J, K, andO, who were the first time armed forces of the C church, such as filing a lawsuit to confirm the existence of abandonment and the existence of P, had been in conflict with the Plaintiff regarding the Plaintiff's activities of the Council, the operation of the church, etc., and there is a dispute as to whether the status of an armed riot is still recognized as an armed riot while seven persons, such as I, etc., are performing their duties again as the armed riot.

On November 3, 2014, the C church filed a lawsuit against seven persons, such as the above I, with the District Court 2014Kahap5717, which sought confirmation of the absence of the status of the C church as an armed riot (hereinafter “the case of confirmation of the existence of the abandonment of the land in this case”), and on February 16, 2016, the same court decided that seven persons, such as the above I, resign from the position of the C church as an armed riot upon the lapse of seven years after he/she was dismissed, and sentenced to the judgment accepting the above claim of the C church.

On the other hand, I et al. oppose the plaintiff around February 2014.