The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Considering that the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case, a significant portion of the damaged goods were returned to the victims, and certain victims did not want the Defendant’s punishment, each of the crimes of this case is committed five times, by the Defendant committed a larceny crime over two times, by intrusion upon residence, and by committing a non-licensed driving crime over two times, and the quality of the crime is not very good in light of the frequency of the crimes, the method of the crime, the scale of damage, etc. In particular, the Defendant had the record of having been punished several times for the same kind of crimes in the past, and even if it has not yet passed since he was sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime, the Defendant repeated each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime, and all other circumstances that form the condition for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.