1. The plaintiff A:

A. Defendant Hosung Urban Construction Co., Ltd.: KRW 97,026,100 and its amount from June 5, 2013 to June 5, 2013.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Between January 20, 191 and February 9, 1991, Plaintiff A owned 21, 25, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, and 21 of the annexed drawings on the E river and F river ground (hereinafter “instant land”) in sequence, and connected each point of the (o) part of the steel-frame panel and roof, 814.5 square meters below the factory building, 30, 29, 46, 31, and 30, 200, 200, 213, 214, 21, 324, 324, 203, 203, 214, 324, 24, 36, 325, 200, 300, 50, 3200, 325, 324, 324, 324, 324

B. On January 22, 1997, Plaintiff B obtained permission to occupy and use a river site with respect to E-do river No. 1,701 square meters, H river No. 582 square meters, F river No. 2,579 square meters, and I river No. 2,405 square meters.

C. Meanwhile, from February 23, 2002, the defendant company occupied the portion of the total of 1,12.8 square meters in total (hereinafter "the part of the dispute of this case") among the parts in the ship (i), (ii), (i), (i), (m), (m), (n), (n), (n), (n), (ii), (m), (m), (q), and (q) and (ii) as shown in the annexed drawing from February 23, 200 to the present date, and the defendant C has occupied the aforementioned part of the dispute of this case from 2005 to the present date.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the parties' arguments

가. J 주택 및 공장에 관한 임료에 대하여 ⑴ 당사자들의 주장 ㈎ 원고의 주장 피고 회사와 C이 2002. 2. 23.부터 현재까지 이 사건 분쟁 부분을 무단으로 점유하고 있으므로, 피고 회사와 C은...