logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.12.15 2016나2087566
구상금
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

From November 11, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the instant lawsuit in attached Form.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and this is cited by Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

O Change 1 to 4 "A evidence 1 to 4" in Part 12 of Part 9 of the judgment of the first instance. Part 9 of the judgment of the first instance is amended by the evidence ". It includes each number of pages 13 of Part 9 of theO judgment of the first instance." The following:

Further, “A evidence 16-1 and 2 of the same conduct” is amended to “A. 16. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the implementation of the registration procedure for cancellation of the establishment of the right of the Defendant under the name of the Plaintiff out of each real estate of this case (including the number of each branch number)” of the first instance judgment, and the reasoning for this part is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, except for modification or addition as follows, this court shall accept it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The Plaintiff, “I” of the first instance judgment of the 10th 20th 10th 10th 29th 20, “I are as mentioned above,” and even if considering the purport of the entire pleadings in the evidence No. 12 and 29th , the Plaintiff received a partial change from the 30th o. 20th 16th o. 16th o. 30, 2016.

arrow