A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The Defendant is not a person dealing with narcotics, but is not a person dealing with narcotics, and is not able to administer or possess a chrophone (one phiphone (one philophone; hereinafter referred to as “philophone”).

1. On December 10, 2017, the Defendant injectedd approximately 0.03g of Changwon-si, Changwon-si B, 601 and 1403g of philophonephones into tap water, and injected them once by inserting them into a single-use injection machine and in one-time medication.

2. On December 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) included the receipts of approximately 0.18g of philopon in Kimhae-si Kimhae-si, (b) No. 805 of Dozphone 805, and (c) included the Defendant’s external slot machine and the Defendant’s inner partets, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Report on investigation (the result of appraisal by a suspect on the seized articles); and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (verification of a surcharge);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc. for the Prevention of Criminal Facts and the Selection of Punishment (the fact of medication and possession of phiphonephones, and the selection of punishment by imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Article 62-2 (1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2 (2) of the Criminal Act for the observation and observation of protection;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. include: (a) that the defendant has a deep depth and reflects his mistake; (b) that the defendant has no record of being punished for narcotics crimes; and (c) the motive, means and result of each of the crimes of this case; (d) the circumstances after the crime; (b) the defendant's age; (c) sexual conduct; (d) intelligence and environment; (e) family relationship; and (e) various conditions of sentencing as shown in the oral argument, including family relationship, set the sentencing guidelines