The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On April 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) taken a cell phone site on the grounds that the 'C’ restaurant located adjacent to the B cafeteria, around 15:30 on April 2, 2016, was slicking in the construction site; and (b) the victim D, who is a construction business operator, controlled the Defendant; and (c) whether this - is -

Chewing Sheet, which reads the victim's desire, and assaulted the victim's boom at hand.

2. The facts charged in this part of the indictment are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. After the indictment of this case was instituted, the court did not wish to punish the defendant on August 11, 2016.

Inasmuch as a written agreement stating the intent of the victim was submitted, this part of the indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.