logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.08 2016가합551033
차용금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 300,000,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from April 5, 2017 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. On September 6, 2006, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiff a promissory note with the face value of KRW 200,000,000 at face value, the place of issue and payment, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the due date of October 10, 2006, and prepared and delivered a notarial deed of promissory notes (No. 959, No. 2006, No. 2006).

On October 31, 2006, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiff a promissory note in the face value of KRW 100,000,000, the place of issue and payment, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the date of payment, and November 13, 2006, and prepared and delivered a notarial deed of promissory notes (No. 1191, No. 2006, Nov. 13, 2006).

[Reasons for Recognition] Judgment by Publication (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 300,000,000 and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from April 5, 2017 to the date following the delivery date of a copy of the instant complaint, which is the day of complete payment, to the day of full payment.

(B) A. (A. (A.) The Plaintiff sought payment of damages for delay from the date of payment of the said promissory note, but the Plaintiff did not have any assertion or proof against the Defendant as to the fact that the said promissory note was lawfully presented within the period for presentment of payment, the Plaintiff’s claim for damages for delay from the date of delivery of the duplicate of the instant complaint is without merit). The Plaintiff’s

arrow