1. Defendant B’s appeal is dismissed.

2. Defendant C shall, upon the primary claim added at the trial of the party, be with Defendant B.

1. As to the main claim

A. A. Around August 5, 2013, Defendant B leased the entire Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E (hereinafter “instant building”) (hereinafter “instant building”) with a deposit of KRW 300 million from J, etc. around KRW 200 million, KRW 200 through KRW 30 million (in reflecting the market price since two years), and the period from August 7, 2013, the Plaintiff’s husband D paid KRW 150 million from the Defendant around October 27, 2013 to KRW 30 million (the intermediate payment of KRW 30 million, KRW 50 million, KRW 70 million, KRW 2000,000, KRW 200,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 200,000, KRW 300,000,000, KRW 130,000,000, KRW 200,000, KRW 1031,2513,2013.

3) On December 28, 2013, Defendant B, who demanded the return of the former deposit after D’s death, would return the former deposit amount of KRW 80 million to the Plaintiff, and on December 28, 2013, Defendant B was charged with obtaining KRW 168 million from K Co., Ltd. (in the event of a contract, the intermediate payment of KRW 40 million was paid in January 6, 2014) in advance, and received KRW 80 million in total the down payment and the intermediate payment as the former deposit. 4) After that, Defendant B was charged with the charge of fraudulent and occupational invalidation as Seoul East East District Court Decision 2014Ma1787, the fact that Defendant B acquired KRW 18 million from L in relation to the sub-lease of the instant store, and each of the facts charged are included in the facts charged.

5. On the other hand, around August 21, 2013, Defendant C transferred part of the fourth floor of the instant building from Defendant B, and thereafter Defendant B under the pretext of the interior construction cost, etc. of the instant building.