Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. On the summary of the reasons for appeal, the defendant asserts that the defendant is too unafford, and that the prosecutor is too unafford and unfair as it is too unafford.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the amount of fraud is about KRW 100 million; (b) the amount of the fraud is about KRW 30 million; (c) the criminal records are three times the same criminal records are disadvantageous to the victim; (d) the criminal defendant has reached an agreement with the victim at the time of the trial; (e) the confession of the crime is contradictory to

In full view of the above sentencing factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the commission of the crime, and all other matters on the sentencing indicated in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence of the lower judgment is deemed reasonable, and the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.