Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 20, 2015, the Defendant around 02:40 on September 20, 2015, on the street, “D main points” located in Sik-si, Sik-si, and the victim E (25 years old) and snow run. As a result, the Defendant, as drinking, 4-5 times off the victim E’s upper part of the victim E, and 25 years off the victim F (25 years old)’s face, as drinking by horse, 2 times off the victim F’s head debt, and f’s head debt.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim E, such as the old net heat hold, which requires treatment for about 21 days, and suffered an injury on the victim F, such as the right knee, which requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each victim's body photograph, diagnosis certificate (F), and diagnosis certificate (E);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order are not weak, a punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of the following factors: (a) the confession and reflect of the defendant; (b) the victims have agreed with the victims; (c) there was no record of criminal punishment beyond juvenile protective disposition prior to the instant case; and (d) other factors of sentencing as indicated in the instant trial.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On May 16, 2015, at around 01:40 on the street, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the female her female son, who was known to G, has been in a dispute with the victim J(18) and said that he was only the victim; (b) on the ground that the victim did not hear the horses, the Defendant, by hand, was able to turn off the victim’s her sonum.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted the victim.

2. The law applicable to judgment: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act: Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.