beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 17, 2017, at around 22:10, the Defendant sought a police box of Seongdong-gu Seoul Sungdong Police Station C located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seoul, and sought advice from the police officer D to whom he belongs of the above police box, about the mobile phone service purchased by the Defendant, and was easy at the police box.
At the same time, a disturbance was avoided from the police box belonging to the above police box, and assaulted, such as pushing the chest part of the above E, shouldering the left hand of the hand.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers at night.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. Written statements of D;
1. A report on investigation (CCTV verification report);
1. A copy of a patrol box assigned to the Sungdong Police Station C;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph victims;
1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution of official duties [the scope of recommendation] and the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the basic area (from June to January 1, 200) (the decision of a sentence] (the decision of a sentence): there may be several records of criminal punishment; the crime of interference with the performance of official duties requires strict punishment in order to establish the State’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority: The defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine.