logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.07.18 2013고정685
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are members of the CFD branch of the CFD branch, who are law firm operators.

The Defendants heard on November 4, 2012, 08:10, when demanding the guarantee of a day off on Sundays in accordance with the policies of the above sub-councils, that the Defendants were engaged in collective transport refusal, and sought a statement that there was a pumps working on Sundays at the construction site of the apartment complex in Yangsan-si, and requested the victim F, who was working at the above construction site, to stop work with other union members, but was rejected by the victim. Defendant A collected a stone with a stone in the surrounding area, and had a studle in the front glass of the I Ppcar owned by the victim G (H) operated by the above F, two or three times again. Defendant B putting a stone with a stone in the surrounding area, and damaged the front left side of the damaged vehicle, the front left side of the damaged vehicle, the front left side of the damaged vehicle, the front left side of the damaged vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly damaged the pumps owned by the victim G to cover KRW 2,632,30,00 for repairing costs, and interfered with the victim F's operation of pumps by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. Written estimate of the damaged vehicle;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for negligence

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.

arrow