logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.02.19 2018고단6728
사기방조
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Seized evidence 6 or 7 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On February 9, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud aiding and abetting at the Busan District Court, and the execution of the sentence was completed in the Western District Court of the Red Prison on August 30, 2018.

【Disscising of the facts of crime】 By misrepresenting the phone call to an unspecified number of unspecified persons as an employee in charge of the lending of a financial institution, the false statement to the effect that “it is possible to lend money at a low interest rate to the other party by means of repayment of existing loans or by obtaining a credit card loan immediately after obtaining a loan,” the accused et al., who received part of the money from the Defendant et al. in return for aiding the crime, was willing to commit the crime of fraud by allowing the accused et al. to withdraw the said money in cash in accordance with the instructions of the person in charge of the unscising and to bring it to the person in charge of the name.”

1. In accordance with the intent of the conspiracy as above, the victim B made a false statement to the effect that, on December 3, 2018, the nameless person called the victim B by phoneing it to the victim B at an unsound place and misrepresenting the C lending staff and “any condition that the loans previously existed shall be repaid, where it is possible to lend a low interest.”

However, in fact, the person who is not the employee in charge of C lending is not the employee in charge of C lending, and the person thought to have divided the money remitted from the victim into accomplices, but did not have the intention or ability to lend the money to

As above, the person who was unaware of name was accused of the victim and was transferred to the Do bank account (E) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

As above, the Defendant provided the above account under the name of the Defendant to a person who was aware of the fact that he was guilty of committing the fraud against the victim, thereby allowing the said account to be used as the receipt account of the fraud, and Seoul on the same day.

arrow