logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고정2771
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaging in driving service of the C large Forest VS125 Simba.

At around 10:00 on August 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) parked the road front of a restaurant located in Cheong-do, Cheong-do; (b) was parked in a hole outside the side of the road before the debate on the ownership of the Defendant; and (c) was made a Uton to operate on the side of the road, the person engaging in driving service had the duty of care to check whether the vehicle is operating on the road, and to check whether the vehicle is operating on the road, and to check whether the vehicle is operating on the road, and to check whether the vehicle is operating on the road, and to prevent the accident by entering the road from the side of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had access to the road outside of the side of the road and walked to the wind angle, and had the GM5 car volume of the Mama F driver operating from the side of the wind angle to the north side of the right side of the road. As part of the left side of the Mama F driver, the Defendant received the front left side of the Mama driver's quantity of the above car from the front left side of the yellow-ray, and damaged the damage amount of KRW 1,773,708 due to the shock.

2. On August 23, 2014, the owner of Oral Ba in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act has to subscribe to and operate mandatory insurance, but the Defendant operated C Obain within a distance of about 2 kilometers from H from the front of the Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, the Defendant’s residence to the front of the Defendant’s argument in Cheongdo-gun, the Cheongdo-gun, the Cheongdo-gun, and around 10:00 on the same day, the Defendant operated C Oba without mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant 1 in court and statement of the police about F;

1. A traffic accident report, traffic accident report (1) and (2), early moving operation, photographs taken at the time of on-site verification, each red inquiry, and an investigation report;

1. Application of the mandatory insurance policy and the Acts and subordinate statutes to discover and notify unregistered vehicles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow