The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of imprisonment with prison labor (one year and six months) by the lower court is too unreasonable;

2. However, despite the fact that the Defendant’s health is not good, and that the Defendant’s mistake is repented and reflects his fault, such circumstance appears to have been reflected in the original judgment through discretionary mitigation. On the other hand, the Defendant has already been sentenced to criminal punishment several times, and the Defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and has served five times for larceny. Nevertheless, the Defendant is going to commit each larceny in the period of a repeated offense for which three months have not passed after the Defendant was released from the prison, and the offense is not good, even if the Defendant was parked from a large number of cargo vehicles, and the victim is not many and less than the amount of damage, the Defendant’s damage recovery or agreement was not reached, the Defendant was sentenced to the maximum sentence for the Defendant, the circumstances leading to the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, home environment, etc., and the records on the sentencing in this case cannot be deemed to have been too unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.