The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor and additional collection of KRW 200,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his depth, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months on September 1, 201 and served three times on March 18, 201, and continued to commit the instant crime again during the repeated crime period despite the completion of the enforcement of the sentence three times on March 18, 201. According to the sentencing guidelines, the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (f) due to the number of instant phiphonephones constitutes the "type 2 (marith, f. and c.)" among the "trade mediation, etc." in the sentencing guidelines, and thus, the scope of the sentence of the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for not more than one year and six months, and the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (f.) due to the administration of the instant phiphones constitutes "one-year imprisonment with prison labor for not more than three years" or "one-six-year imprisonment with prison labor for not more than three years" (3 years) years).

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.