The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (one hundred months of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below was made in favor of the defendant, such as the confession and rebuttal of the crime of this case, the crime of this case is merely one-time medication, the defendant aggravated health due to the operation of a clopon, etc., and the defendant cooperates with the investigation into the arrest of a drug offender. However, the defendant has a record of punishment five times (one time of suspended sentence, one time of imprisonment, and four times) due to the same crime, the defendant committed the crime of this case in the period of repeated crime without being informed of the final punishment (one year and two months of imprisonment) after being released from the prison, after being released from the prison, after being released from the prison, and the scope of the recommendation guidelines of the Supreme Court for the crime of this case [basic crime: the scope of recommendation of the sentencing guidelines of the defendant for the crime of this case] of the three types such as medication, simple possession of narcotics crime, aggravated factors - the same criminal for three years (the aggravated punishment area within three years), considering the above favorable circumstances of the defendant, considering the above circumstances, it cannot be seen that the defendant's age and circumstances were unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.