1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff sought revocation of the Defendant’s six-month business suspension disposition as of November 5, 2018 and one-month business suspension disposition as of November 30, 2018, and the first instance court rendered a judgment dismissing all of the Plaintiff’s claims. Accordingly, the Plaintiff appealed only against the part concerning the six-month business suspension disposition as of November 5, 2018, and thus, the scope of the judgment in this court is limited to the part seeking revocation of the six-month business suspension disposition as of November 5, 2018.

2. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance. However, even when examining the evidence submitted to the court of first instance in light of the relevant statutes and legal principles, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are just and there is no error as alleged by the plaintiff as the grounds for appeal.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.