logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.06.10 2015고단299
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a wing and cargo vehicle B.

On October 15, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo without obtaining a driver's license at around 08:50 on October 15, 2014, and led to the speed of about 60 km from the 3rd distance in the new eroscopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic

At this point, since the center line of yellow-ray is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front line and safely operate the bus, and to prevent accidents by neglecting this duty of care, the defendant neglected this duty, and caused the fault of the victim C (52 years old) driver, who was drinking from the opposite side office of the Doggri Village, to the opposite side of the driver C(52 year old city bus driver), who was drinking in the opposite side of the Doggri Village in the opposite side office, to the left side of the Dogriri Village.

As a result, the Defendant caused injury to the victim, such as the two external blood transfusions, which are one of the two main points in need of approximately ten weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time damaged the said damaged cargo vehicle by KRW 13,795,912 of the repairing cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Public announcement and notification of the ledger of driver's licenses, details of conditional cancellation of driver's licenses;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on actual condition investigation, and photographs;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 and 7 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The provisions of Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act concerning the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents with heavy punishment.

arrow