1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff and the defendant are siblings.

B. As to the land of this case (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) owned by the Plaintiff, the registration of ownership transfer (hereinafter “instant registration of ownership transfer”) was completed on the following grounds: Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, the Hongcheon-gun, the Hongcheon-gun, the Hongcheon District Court, the registration office of Hongcheon-gun, 2261, which received on February 10, 2003, based on donation (hereinafter “instant donation”) (hereinafter “instant donation”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The parties' assertion that the plaintiff was the spouse at the time of the donation of this case and received treatment because he was suffering from a disease that is unable to move, and was in custody of each of the documents related to the land of this case at the house. However, the defendant stolen all documents necessary for the transfer of ownership through crypting that the defendant did not have proper corrective devices in the plaintiff's house due to the plaintiff's disease, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant, so the registration of transfer of ownership in

As to this, the defendant purchased each of the lands of this case and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the plaintiff's future, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in each of the lands of this case. After the defendant donated each of the lands of this case under the condition to care for his parents from the deceased E around 2003 and completed the registration of ownership transfer of this case, her mother is gathered from each of the lands of this case and her mother is deaf-do. Thus, the defendant acquired the ownership of each of the lands of this case by legitimate grounds for registration, and even if it is not so, the defendant occupied each of the lands of this case in good faith with peace and public performance after the completion of the registration of ownership transfer on February 10, 203 without negligence and completed the acquisition by possession on February 10, 2013, the registration of ownership transfer of this case is consistent with the substantive rights.