Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two-year imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Branch on February 12, 2020; Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three-year imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act; Defendant B was subject to probation; Defendant B was ordered to provide community service for 160 hours; and Defendant B was ordered to attend a compliance driving course for 40 hours

[2019 Highest 3920, 2020 Highest 137 (Consolidation)]

1. The Defendants A and B conspired with C and D (former summary disposition on the same day) to attract customers with the advertisement of false heavy-sized vehicles for the purpose of equipment, and planned to pay the difference by notifying the customer of the amount less than the actual purchase price of the vehicle as the purchase price of the vehicle and notifying the customer of the amount less than the actual purchase price of the vehicle.

Accordingly, Defendant B and D, around June 22, 2018, posted on the Internet “E” website after the Incheon City City, sent a false statement to the victim F, who reported and contacted the Internet “E” website, as if he could purchase Tbluri vehicle at KRW 9 million, thereby inducing the victim to the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G building.

C around 13:50 on July 5, 2018, according to Defendant A’s instructions, the Defendant made a false statement that “A” in the “G building” provides a contract for arranging the purchase and sale of the victim in the number 9,200,000,000, and “A” itself shall pay KRW 25,000,000 as the vehicle is going beyond the auction because it is the vehicle going beyond the auction, and if I want to cancel the contract because it is impossible to cancel the contract, I would purchase another vehicle and sell it in the low price of KRW 14,00,000 and not receive the brokerage commission.”

In fact, since the above Tluri vehicle was falsely sold, the Defendants had no intention or ability to arrange the sale of the above Tluri vehicle in KRW 9,200,000, and there was no additional payment for the said Tluri vehicle.