1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The plaintiff lent 10,00,000 won to the defendant on January 11, 2006 without interest. Thus, the defendant asserts that the defendant is obligated to return the above loan to the plaintiff.

In full view of the purport of the arguments in Gap evidence No. 2-6, Gap evidence No. 3-2, and Eul evidence No. 4, the plaintiff transferred KRW 21,00,000 to the defendant's agricultural cooperative account on January 11, 2006 (the plaintiff's assertion that the above KRW 11,000,000 out of the above KRW 21,000,000 was remitted to the defendant for the repayment of his debt to the defendant, and that the remaining KRW 10,00,000 was the loan of this case). The above fact-finding alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the plaintiff lent KRW 10,00,000 to the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.