A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 27, 2019, the Defendant, by misrepresenting a financial institution and making a false statement that he would create a Maspbook at a low interest rate when he redeems existing loans from many unspecified persons, and thereby deceiving the money from the name defecter of the organization of telecommunications-based financial fraud (hereinafter “Sspishing”). Upon receiving the proposal, the Defendant sent the account number of the E-bank account in the name of the Defendant to the employees of the E-bank account in the name of the Defendant after consenting to the lending process of creating cash transaction (hereinafter “Spishing”).

On the other hand, on October 1, 2019, an employee under the name in distress who conspireds with the above person under the name of the victim and the person under the name of the victim to commit the phishing fraud shall misrepresent himself/herself to the H bank I acting on behalf of the H bank, and shall make a false statement that "where an existing card loan is repaid to the designated account, a low interest rate may be available," and it was remitted from the victim to the above E-bank account in the name of the defendant under the name of the victim for the repayment of the existing loan on the same day.

The method by which the defendant received money from the above company from the above company is an abnormal loan method based on the increase in the cash transaction by receiving and withdrawing the money from the above company as a fraudulent loan brokerage company, and thus, it was not confirmed that the above company and D cooperatives actually work for the company B, and that the above company and D associations did not actually work for the company B. The above person under whose name was not the representative number of the company was contacted with the defendant, not Kakao Stockholm, and the amount transferred to the defendant's account was remitted to the defendant's personal name, not the above company. In withdrawing the money in question at the bank counter, it was announced that the source or purpose of use was false and announced in a false statement to prevent Bosing.