A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence No. 4, 6, 7, 11 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, in collusion with the employees of the phishing operations, committed the phishing fraud by misrepresenting to a large number of unspecified domestic employees of financial institutions.

Accordingly, the name-free phishing employee was able to call money to a specific account by deceiving the victims that he should pay the money in order to obtain a loan after misrepresenting the employees of the financial institution. The account owner is able to deliver the money to the account owner in return for requesting the withdrawal of the money to reduce the fee, and the defendant is able to obtain 3% of the amount of the money to be withdrawn after receiving the money from the account holders as the fee and to have the remainder paid to the account manager in return for the money.

1. On July 12, 2017, a staff member in charge of deceptioning the false name of fraud is allowed to borrow a loan at a low interest rate by misrepresenting the staff member of the Korean National Bank to the victim C by telephoneing to the victim C.

If a loan is repaid again with a loan from the business Love, the loan will be made at a low interest rate of 5% up to 16 million won.

D The amount of loans of 5 million won is refunded to the corporate bank account of the D.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the facts did not have the intent or ability to provide loans to the defendant or the defendant's name influence singing staff.

On the 14th day of the same month, the Minister of Foreign Affairs received 5 million won from the injured party from the bank account (Account Number:E) in the name of D on the 14th day of the same month, and had D continuously withdraw 5 million won deposited in the above account, and the Defendant received 5 million won withdrawn from D, and then received 4 million won from D and delivered the remaining 4.6 million won to the non-name member.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with his nameless assistance staff.

2. On July 14, 2017, the 201.7% misrepresentation of KB Capital staff by phone call from the victim F around July 14, 2017.