1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 20,073,942 with the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 1, 2016 to August 8, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 23, 2003, the Plaintiff newly constructed B’s housing located in the East Sea (hereinafter “instant housing”) and extended the two-story housing on September 17, 2003 and around February 2005 after completing the registration of ownership preservation. At present, the first floor is a restaurant, the second floor is used as a house, and is residing in the present year.

B. The Defendant Land Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Land Trust Co., Ltd.”) is an executor of the construction work of constructing a new apartment on the ground level 1 and 29 stories above ground level 24 stories above the ground level in the East Sea, which is adjacent to the instant housing (hereinafter “instant construction work”). The Defendant Substitute Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Substitute Construction”) is the starting work of the instant construction work.

C. The Defendant Substitute Construction installed 4 meters soundproof walls on the boundary of the instant construction site, and this soundproof walls are almost adjacent to the Defendant’s housing.

Defendant Daedae Construction commenced on December 17, 2015. From December 24, 2015 to January 2016, 2015, for the construction of the base of the first floor and the base base of the underground floor, H beam was inserted with the shot beam inserted with the sloping equipment, and the shot beam was inserted with the shot light with the shot light with the shot light with the shot light.

E. On June 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant construction was ruptured in the instant house, and received safety diagnosis from the construction office of the Sungjin Rescue Safety Technology Group. According to the diagnosis result, it is presumed that “the instant second floor has ruptured on the instant second floor,” and it is presumed that some ruptures were additionally carried out with the vibration generated at the time of the hn beam operation and the basic file rupture operation, but it is difficult to clearly distinguish the rupture due to the characteristics of the lighting structure from the rupture structure.”

F. Since the instant construction, ground subsidence, rupture, etc. were discovered in the instant housing.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, Eul evidence 1 to 6, and evidence 11, and the result of the on-site inspection by this court.