Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from April 22, 2014 to January 12, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. From September 1, 2013 to March 31, 2016, the Plaintiff is a person working as the head of Songpa-gu Seoul apartment (hereinafter referred to as “instant apartment”)’s management office, and the Defendant is a person who was the president of the pre-council of occupants’ representatives of the instant apartment from April 1, 2012 to October 17, 2013.
B. At around 15:20 on April 4, 2014, the Defendant threatened the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (a) around 15:20, the apartment management office of the instant apartment: (b) on the basis of the chaired person who was in the office of the Plaintiff, the Defendant told the Plaintiff to “finite down,” thereby interfering with the Plaintiff’s work by threatening the Plaintiff and exercising power; (c) on April 7, 2014, the management office employees of the management office of the instant apartment: (a) on the grounds that the Plaintiff was “finite, pins with the apartment; (b) he will throw away the apartment house; and (c) on April 11:30, 2014, the Defendant insulting the Plaintiff, who was a staff member of the management office of the instant apartment management office, saying, “hin, without any circumstances, and as soon as possible.”
On September 17, 2015, the Defendant was indicted of the foregoing criminal facts, etc. and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year in the sixth month of imprisonment with prison labor for intimidation, insult, and interference with business by Seoul Eastern District Court 2014Kadan2430.
Although the Defendant appealed for innocence on May 26, 2016, the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2015No1272 sentenced the dismissal of the appeal. On September 8, 2016, the Defendant’s appeal was dismissed by Supreme Court Decision 2016Do8916, which became final and conclusive in the above judgment of the first instance.
C. On April 10, 2014, the Defendant stated the Defendant’s criminal facts as indicated in the 19th meeting materials of the council of occupants’ representatives, which were distributed by the representatives of occupants, as indicated in the 19th meeting materials of the council of occupants’ representatives. On April 11, 2014, the contents of such meeting materials were posted on the apartment website, and the Plaintiff posted them on the said apartment website.