(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.07.23 2020고단1152

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.07.23 2020고단1152

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-speed car B.

On November 1, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 06:25, the Defendant driven the said car, leading the road in front of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment Park at a speed of the speed of the hour, from the direction of D apartment to the direction of C Apartment.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who renders a way to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive the road.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the part on the left-hand bridge of the victim E (the age of 71) who walked on the crosswalk from the right-hand side of the proceeding direction to the left-hand side of the road, was shocked into the right-hand side of the defendant's driver's vehicle and the gate part.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the “influence of the left side and the first part part of the satisfaction part, the opening of the lower part of the body,” which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of diagnosis certificates;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

참조조문

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2013.04.03 2013고단403

-서울북부지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고단1248

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2013.08.30 2013고단141

-부산지방법원 2013.10.22 2013고단4382

-서울남부지방법원 2013.10.23 2013고단936