A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On June 18, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for fraud and 2 years of suspended execution at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 26, 2015.

[Criminal facts] 2015 Highest 394

1. On August 20, 2012, the Defendant, at around August 20, 2012, would have repaid the victim F with “70 million won” at the E-stock company office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D around August 20, 2012.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the fact is that the defendant was unable to operate G, so there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 70 million won as the loan from the injured party, i.e., the Defendant received from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On February 12, 2013, the criminal defendant, on February 12, 2013, by asking the victim F to the victim F at an unsound place in Seoul and below Seoul around February 12, 2013, he/she would promptly repay “1 million won if he/she lends it.”

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the fact is that the defendant was unable to operate G, so there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant was given 1 million won as a loan from the injured party, i.e., the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. On March 29, 2013, the criminal defendant, on March 29, 2013, by posting a phone to the victim F at an infinite place in Seoul around March 29, 2013, he/she would immediately repay “3 million won if he/she lends it.”

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the fact is that the defendant was unable to operate G, so there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant is the name of the victim, namely, the borrowed money from the seat.