The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the form of imprisonment with prison labor for the first to third crimes at the time of the original adjudication and for the fourth crimes at the time of the original adjudication, three months) of the lower court's punishment against the accused is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below recognizes the crime of this case. The crime of this case is deemed to be in a concurrent relationship between the crime of the first head of the crime and the crime of the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act at the time of the judgment of the court below. However, it is recognized that the amount of damage is not small and there is no special circumstance or change in circumstances that can be considered in the sentencing after the judgment of the court below was rendered, and there are other various circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.