beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Daejeon District Court's Incheon District Court's Branch on April 28, 2015, and such judgment became final and conclusive on June 5, 2015.
[Basic Facts] On May 25, 2007, the Defendant is implementing the new construction of the Do Parking Building Building to the victim C on May 25, 2007, and when the construction of the 2.4 billion won is completed in the state that the land price was already paid to the land owner at the construction site, the Defendant would sell the land to the land owner, and would be able to settle the balance of the construction cost and settle the cost of the construction and make a profit to the owner of the land, and the Defendant would have not repaid the amount of 50 million won to the victim on October 30, 2007.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On June 11, 2008, the Defendant: (a) on June 11, 2008, at the GNC Business Office, GNC, Inc., Ltd., on the 898 second floor, the Defendant: (b) asked the victim for reasons that the victim did not repay the loan amount of KRW 500 million; (c) “In fact, 50 million won has been spent for all kinds of expenses, including construction expenses, including the loan. The landowner filed a complaint against B by forging private documents; (d) the owner of the land may not proceed with the construction unless he/she appoints an attorney. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 40,00,00 from the cost of attorney’s fee and seizure, etc., he/she would be able to repay the loan amount of KRW 44,40,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000 won, regardless of winning or winning in the lawsuit with the landowner.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any other property under the name of the Defendant as of June 11, 2008, and lost the case of provisional seizure with the landowner, and the Defendant was convicted of the charge of committing a crime of aiding and abetting a private document, and it was impossible to continue the construction work, and there was no other alternative to repay the money borrowed from the victim. It did not comply with the terms and conditions for E construction.