1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to the real estate stated in the separate sheet, Defendant Newdo Construction Co., Ltd.

1. Each claim against Defendant Newdo Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Newdo Construction”) and Namyang-si Co., Ltd.

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment made by deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Requests against the defendant National Health Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Corporation");

A. (1) The parties asserted that the statute of limitations expired since the secured debt of the Plaintiff Newdo Construction’s comprehensive mortgage claim was not exercised for ten years from the date of establishment of the right to collateral security.

Therefore, Defendant Newdo Construction should cancel the right to collateral security, and Defendant Corporation, the seizure right holder of the right to collateral security, has a duty to express his/her consent on the registration of cancellation of the right to collateral security.

(2) From August 2010 to November 2016, Defendant Newdo Construction failed to pay a total of KRW 1,483,432,390, the sum of health insurance premium, pension insurance premium, employment insurance premium, and industrial accident insurance premium, Defendant Newdo Construction Corporation’s claims against Defendant Newdo Construction under the National Tax Collection Act, and thus, it cannot accept the Plaintiff’s request.

B. (1) Determination (1) On October 5, 2004, the Plaintiff’s real estate indicated in the attached list on the same day (hereinafter “instant real estate”) based on the contract to establish a contract on the same day is ordered to Defendant Newdo Construction.

The registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage (hereinafter “instant mortgage”) as indicated in the port was completed, and Defendant Corporation attached the instant mortgage claim on October 13, 2014 and completed the registration of the seizure on October 20, 2014, there is no dispute between the parties.

(2) In the event that a claim with the right to collateral security is seized, the purpose of registering the seizure of the right to collateral security by means of additional registration in the establishment registration of the right to collateral security is to have the effect of seizure on the right to collateral security, which is a subordinate right based on the incidental nature of the right to collateral security, if the secured right