logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.21 2015나12564
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 13 of the judgment on the cause of the claim (including a serial number), and the testimony of witness F of the party trial, the plaintiff is a person operating business such as manufacturing, attaching, or selling advertising materials, such as banner, signboard, etc. with the trade name of "D", and the defendant was a person who left E candidate at a national local election conducted on June 4, 2014. The plaintiff was requested from the defendant for the production and installation of banner necessary for the above election, operation of election vehicles, etc., supply them to the defendant during the above election campaign period, and the total value of which exceeds KRW 129,701,00,000. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay to the defendant the remaining 64,705,700,000 won calculated by subtracting the plaintiff's paid from the total value of supply as above to the plaintiff (i.e., a copy of the complaint of this case from 200,70100).

(1) Although the Defendant asserted that there was no request from the Plaintiff for the supply of election-related supplies, the Defendant’s request for the supply of election-related supplies can be sufficiently recognized, according to the above evidence, including the statement of No. 3 and the testimony of No. 16 of the trial witness F, as well as the fact that the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to supply election-related supplies for the Defendant without the request from the Defendant, and that it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff voluntarily supplied election-related supplies more than KRW 100,000 for the Defendant, or that the argue requested the Plaintiff without the Defendant’s permission, the above argument by the Defendant is difficult to accept).

arrow