1. Between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff has a new position as to the building indicated in the separate sheet.

1. The plaintiff (legal title C) is a deceased person, who was the chief director of the defendant, and is a lineal ascendant or descendant of D (legal title E).

The defendant is a Buddhist organization comprised of the lineal ascendants and descendants of D, which is an incorporated foundation that carries out projects such as the establishment, operation, and support of the training center for the purpose of performing the practice of living in common, promoting national welfare, and maintaining and managing property owned by the defendant.

D purchased a temple 468,678m2 (hereinafter “instant land”) on the ground to build a temple on the same ground, and made a contribution to the Defendant on June 22, 1992 in the name of the Defendant by means of completing the registration of ownership transfer on June 22, 1992, and became to have the status of creation by making a contribution to the Defendant under the name of the Defendant.

The defendant asserts that the concept of "original owner" can only be recognized as a temple, and that it cannot be recognized as a forest without a temple, such as the land in this case. However, in light of the fact that the land in this case was a temple for the purpose of construction of the temple, that the defendant also recognized the existence of a "original owner" as to the land in this case, and that the status of the "original owner" as to the land in this case is recognized as transfer from D to J (No. 2-1) (No. 2-1), even if a temple is not constructed, the concept of "original owner" can be recognized as to the land in this case for the purpose of construction of the temple, and that the status may be succeeded.

Therefore, the defendant's argument on this is without merit.

A religious organization located in Dongducheon-si G, G, and H was a temple that became a branch member of the defendant around 1993.

Of the defendant's articles of incorporation and the rules on the establishment of branch institutes, the parts concerning the Changju or the president of branch institutes are as follows:

Article 2 (Office amended on November 10, 2015) of the Articles of Incorporation (Amendment), the principal office of the defendant may be established at the Cheongju-si and branch offices may be established as necessary.

Article 16 (Establishment of Branch Offices and Branch Offices) The Branch Offices shall be established pursuant to Article 2 of the present Articles of Incorporation.

1. The windowper shall be the windowper by a resolution of the board of directors.