The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as stated in its reasoning, and the Defendant has not broken up 10 glass cups within the main points from October 31, 2013 to October 31, 2013, and there was no damage to the head of a teahouse in GJ on October 31, 2013.

2. The judgment below and the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below. ① With respect to the circumstances at the time of the crime of destroying property as stated in the judgment below, the victim D stated in the court below that " around October 31, 2013 to October 31, 2013, 02:50, the victim D was damaged in the room in which the victim D had a sound of 10 glass cupped in the room in which the victim D had mixed with the defendant. ② The defendant stated in the court below that it was hard to avoid disturbance, such as hhething and cellular phone at the time of the crime of damaging public goods as stated in the judgment of the court below. ② The defendant stated in the judgment below that the victim's h and grupary police officers belonging to the Kj were destroyed and damaged in the course of the crime of damaging public goods as stated in the judgment of the court below, at least 10 others were destroyed and damaged in the course of the judgment below.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.